Re: [asa] the Way Science Works/

From: <drsyme@cablespeed.com>
Date: Fri Jul 27 2007 - 10:06:02 EDT

What a fascinating sentence that is, probably more interesting than you intended.

First of all, what is the "traditional" view?  I agree that there are some interpretations of Genesis that are in conflict with science, but I am not sure how traditional they are.  And those who hold those views would consider it anathema to "reinterpret" Genesis because it conflicts with science.  Those that hold this view would consider the science flawed, and scripture as the only source of truth.

Second, you used the word framework.  Whether you realize it or not, there is a biblical interpretation titled the "framework" view.  It sees Genesis more figuratively, but not as a fairly tale, and it does not conflict with science.  If you are not familiar with it the leading authors of this view are Meredith Kline and Henri Blocher, among others.



On Fri Jul 27 9:18 , "George Cooper" sent:

 

Since the traditionally viewed framework of Genesis is now in conflict with science, reinterpretation is required.  People who see it as a fairy tale will certainly have little reason to take it seriously.   

 

 

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message. Received on Fri Jul 27 10:06:35 2007