Re: [asa] Detecting Design

From: Michael Roberts <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>
Date: Fri Jul 20 2007 - 14:11:22 EDT

> > Michael Behe assures us in his latest book that the malaria parasite
was
> intelligently designed, whereas its evolution of chloroquine resistance
> was not, all based on some mathematical calculations (which I think are
> very questionable, by the way). I'm sorry, but I find it much more
> compatible with Christian faith to accept that sexual reproduction,
> flowers, butterflies, and malaria parasites all evolved and continue to
> evolve much as neo-Darwinian theory suggests.
>
> > Charles (Chuck) F. Austerberry, Ph.D.
>
This is one of my major criticisms and I stressed this two-tier creation of
designed and undesigned in my PSCF article of Dec 99 and in my chapter
inDebating Design (ed Ruse and dembski) .

What else can one say except that he like all IDers has a very limited and
stunted doctrine of creation.

Michael

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Jul 20 14:29:11 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 20 2007 - 14:29:11 EDT