<p>Gregory -</p><p>To your query below: While I have not addressed "theological naturalism" in the way Hunter understands it, I have repeatedly called attention to what I believe are excellent theological reasons to accept MN, a position which qualifies, I think, as some type of "theological naturalism" - & one a lot more interesting & profitable than what Hunter presents. So if you want to discuss it, go ahead.</p><p>Shalom,</p><p>George</p><p>Arago p.s. still NOBODY has raised the topic of 'theological naturalism' raised by Hunter at the beginning of this thread. Why??? </p><p />
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Jul 18 15:26:02 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 18 2007 - 15:26:02 EDT