Steve wrote: "Dawkins is quoted as saying:
As for the option that [Lemaître's] physics might or might not be taken
to support Genesis, why is it even an interesting question? There never
was reason to expect that the writings of an unknown scribe, probably
less than a millennium ago "
My guess is that it is a misquotation. I admire Dawkins a good deal for
his excellent writing (much in the footsteps of Steven Gould) and I don't
really think he would make such an elementary error.
BTW, welcome to the list.
Burgy
"The first key to wisdom is frequent questioning. For it is by doubting
that we come in enquiry and by enquiry we arrive at the truth." --
Abelard
www.burgy.50megs.com/scott.htm (Review of Eugenie Scott's EVOLUTION AND
CREATIONISM
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Jul 13 17:52:44 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 13 2007 - 17:52:44 EDT