On 7/11/07, David Campbell <pleuronaia@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This article is well researched and informative. However, it attacks
> > Christianity, in particular its claims to exclusivity. It also tries to
> > attribute certain extremist political positions to ID by such tactics as
> > mentioning that one ID advocate gave a talk to a group with members
> > holding such views or noting some sort of connection between one ID
> > advocate and some member of the John Birch Society. This is hardly a
> > reliable way to ascertain the position of a group.
>
> Yes, Forrest's complaints about the political agenda of ID suffer
> greatly in credibility because she wants to advance a rival
> antireligious and liberal political agenda. Thus very similar
Now that is an interesting argument. Forrest's complains suffer
because some believe her to be biased. However, her descriptions of ID
are well supported by plenty of references so I am not sure why one
wants to go down this road.
> critiques can be leveled at her, and by similar unwarranted
> extrapolations, to anyone with any connection to her or her views.
Any examples of this?
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Jul 11 23:56:06 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 11 2007 - 23:56:06 EDT