I felt that McGrath's book was disappointingly short. As far as I can see,
however, Orr's review blows Dawkins out of the water, and carries all the
more weight being from someone who one would have thought would be on
Dawkins's side (Orr states that "The Selfish Gene" is one of the best
popular science books ever written). Orr is also a very strong critic of
Intelligent Design and is about as devastating in criticism of both ID and
Dawkins.
Iain
On 7/9/07, David Opderbeck <dopderbeck@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well, it's an amusing quote, for one, and I'm looking forward to reading
> McGrath's book, for another, but maybe even more importantly, Ruse's
> reaction seems to support the notion that most of us here have not misread
> Dawkins.
>
>
> On 7/9/07, PvM <pvm.pandas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > And your point is exactly what?
> >
> > On 7/9/07, David Opderbeck < dopderbeck@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > "The God Delusion makes me embarrassed to be an atheist, and the
> > McGraths
> > > show why." -- Michael Ruse, blurbing Alister and Joanna McGrath's new
> > book,
> > > "The Dawkins Delusion."
> >
>
>
-- ----------- After the game, the King and the pawn go back in the same box. - Italian Proverb ----------- To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.Received on Mon Jul 9 15:00:59 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 09 2007 - 15:00:59 EDT