Merv wrote:
My point was that, with regard to celestial mechanics, some choices
are vastly simpler mathematically than others. And I know that ‘simpler’
doesn’t equal ‘proven’, but it does often (and especially in this case)
equal ‘almost certainly closer to reality’.
Some people enjoy calculating Christoffel symbols. George
appears to be one of them. :-)
Actually, I doubt that modern geocentrist would use them,
as that would only tend to prove that the earth is not at the
center of the universe. But maybe you could use them as
"correction factors".
by Grace we proceed,
Wayne (ASA)
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Jul 6 19:16:06 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 06 2007 - 19:16:06 EDT