"we may find that the Darwinian understanding of
evolution will have to be changed, but that will not
mean going back to special creation & a static picture
of the world." - George Murphy
Thank you George, this was in some sense what I was
hoping for. If one admits that Darwin's understanding
of evolution can be changed, they leave open the
possibility of a more comprehensive understanding of
our earthly reality. 'Going back' is not the main
issue. It is where we shall go forward to that is the
looming debate, which I would agree ID fails to
capture.
Going to see Book of the Cosmos speaker today at
Regent College. Will respond to D. Campbell's
excellent post later.
Gregory
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Jul 3 14:48:29 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 03 2007 - 14:48:29 EDT