On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 Dawsonzhu@aol.com wrote:
> Vernon wrote:
>
> > It's not that I don't want to, Paul; it's just not possible! You see,
> > numerical geometry as a pictorial tool is confined to a relatively small subset
> > of the natural numbers - and 1899 is not found among these.
>
> Maybe not numerical geometry, but how about prime numbers,
> or some other pattern. So little is understood about natural
> numbers, maybe 1899 has something else to offer.
>
If the text of Genesis 1:1 had come down to us without the object markers,
I think that Vernon would still have found interesting features. For
example, he might observe what happens if one permutes the digits of 1899.
1998=2x999, and 8991= 9x999, and 999 is a multiple of 37, which interests
him very much. Of course, these two should count as only one feature since
switching the first and fourth digits of any number makes a difference in
value of a multiple of 999.
Gordon Brown
Department of Mathematics
University of Colorado
Boulder, CO 80309-0395
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Sep 26 11:25:44 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 26 2006 - 11:25:44 EDT