[asa] AIG

Bob commented on AIG's argument:

"Have they no shame?"

I think the argument they present, in the context of their worldview, is
fairly persuasive. Certainly it appears they believe it. So "shame" is
not involved unless you posit that they are being deliberately
untruthful. From my discuusions with Morris and Gish and Ham back in 1988
that does not appear to be the case. Tey really do believe this crap.

David commented: "So this "exegesis" of 2 Peter not only misses the point
of the passage (and really the point of the whole letter), it also leads
to a pagan
understanding of God and the cosmos -- an arbitrary god who is unable to
establish consistent rules for creation and a cosmos that is utterly
beyond
rational comprehension,..."

Hmm. If I think like a YEC I think I'd disagree.

Jack commented: "... the "scoffers" referred to by Peter, were present in
=
68AD give or take a year or two"

Makes sense to me.

j

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Sep 4 11:50:35 2006