Hi, Ted,
Thank you for your informative post.=20
You speak of the "...various ways in which one might respond..." to
the =
paradox of a God of love who accomplishes His creative work by its =
antithesis, evolution, and have outlined the one that makes best sense =
for you. I have to say, mine would be a more Occam-directed approach - =
involving the ditching of Darwinism. After all, why should a mere
theory =
- now (thanks to Jonathan Wells) stripped of its time-worn 'proofs' - =
continue to hold its adherents in thrall? Can there be any real doubt =
that this doctrine is the sworn enemy of Christians, the Judeo-
Christian =
Scriptures, and the Gospel of Jesus Christ? It is surely time that TEs =
jettisoned the whole sorry enterprise and sought a better, Bible-
based, =
interpretation of _all_ the data which have a bearing on origins.
Vernon
www.otherbiblecode.com
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Sep 3 19:16:50 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Sep 03 2006 - 19:16:50 EDT