Re: Reading Genesis literally

From: Michael Roberts <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>
Date: Sat Apr 22 2006 - 16:41:21 EDT

Next book

The Republican War on American Humor (sic)

Michael

----- Original Message -----
From: "George Murphy" <gmurphy@raex.com>
To: <burgytwo@juno.com>; <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: Reading Genesis literally

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <burgytwo@juno.com>
> To: <asa@calvin.edu>
> Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 3:37 PM
> Subject: Reading Genesis literally
>
>
>> From AIG this week:
>>
>> Q: AiG teaches that we must take Genesis as written, but should we take
>> the whole Bible literally?
>>
>> A: It's true, for example, that Jesus quoted from Genesis when he talked
>> about the foundation of marriage. Thus, he took Genesis literally. Paul
>> quoted from Genesis when writing about the first man and the Last Adam,
>> so he accepted Genesis literally, too.
>
> This is worth preserving as a textbook example of non sequiturs.
>
>
> Shalom
> George
> http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
>
>
>
Received on Sat Apr 22 16:57:41 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 22 2006 - 16:57:41 EDT