Fw: great creationists of the past

From: Michael Roberts <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>
Date: Sun Apr 16 2006 - 15:06:19 EDT

Ted's corrected me! Maybe I am too enthusiastic about bastards!-----
Original Message -----
From: "Ted Davis" <tdavis@messiah.edu>
To: <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: great creationists of the past

> Michael:
>
> Unless you know something I don't know (and that would apply to much of
> what
> you know), the SOB Galileo had only 3 bastards, not 6.
>
> ted
>
>>>> "Michael Roberts" <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk> 04/15/06 1:37 PM
>>>> >>>
> I once heard D Gish speak half a mile from Darwin's birthplace . He cited
> 4
> creationists of the past ; Newton Kelvin Agassiz and Galileo , so I ask if
> we should follow their examples;
>
> rarely go to church like Kelvin
>
> deny the Trinity like Newton
>
> be a racist like Agassiz (and deny the Trinity)
>
> and have 6 bastards like Galileo
>
> The effect was electric.
>
> Sadly open questions are not allowed at YEC meetings now and perhaps I am
> partly to blame.
>
> Michael
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Hamilton" <williamehamiltonjr@yahoo.com>
> To: "Mervin Bitikofer" <mrb22667@kansas.net>; <asa@calvin.edu>
> Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 6:16 PM
> Subject: Re: great creationists of the past
>
>
>> While Isaac Newton may very well have been a creationist, if the
>> creationists
>> who made up the list had delved into his beliefs, they might not have
>> wanted to
>> include him. My understanding is that Newton was an Arian.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bill Hamilton
>> William E. Hamilton, Jr., Ph.D.
>> 248.652.4148 (home) 248.303.8651 (mobile)
>> "...If God is for us, who is against us?" Rom 8:31
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>
>
>
Received on Sun Apr 16 15:17:47 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 16 2006 - 15:17:47 EDT