Re: Creation Science of Mid-America

Surely this explains why ID is subsumed into YEC by many opponents? By
allowing their ideas to be part of YEC and the Trojan Horse of YEC
(deliberate expression) can tend to see both as one and the same thing.

Five years ago I always said that ID and YEC were totally separate, I now
consider them to be so intertwined (Pandas and People) that for all intents
and purposes they are the same and have the same malevolent effect.

I loved Burgy's gradation of YEC manners from ICR (gentlemen - despite their
porkies), AIG with nice gentle Ham and Safarti and worst Willis. Where does
that mild-mannered Australian John Mackay come into this scale of ill
manners?

Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Davis" <tdavis@messiah.edu>
To: "American Scientific Affiliation" <asa@calvin.edu>; <kbmill@ksu.edu>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: Creation Science of Mid-America

>>>> Keith Miller <kbmill@ksu.edu> 04/13/06 10:32 AM >>>writes:
> Tom Willis was the ghost writer for the Kansas Science Standards in
> 1999, that were approved by the state board and then subsequently
> rejected after the next election. He has been a major player behind
> the scenes, and is influential with the current state board president.
>
> Despite the ID language being used, it is these groups that are
> driving the agenda at the local level.
>
> Ted replies:
> Wow! I hadn't known this very important piece of information, which
> explains a great deal. Thank you for the information, Keith. Is there
> any
> public documentation, or else can you fill me in privately?
>
>
>
Received on Fri Apr 14 03:27:18 2006