Re: Physical Resurrection

From: D. F. Siemens, Jr. <dfsiemensjr@juno.com>
Date: Tue Apr 11 2006 - 22:45:29 EDT

The old standard answer referred to man as body, soul and spirit.
Dave

On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:07:50 -0400 "David Opderbeck"
<dopderbeck@gmail.com> writes:
Apropos of this, tonight, out of the blue, my 8-year-old son asked me
"dad, how can God be three and one at the same time." Wow! I remembered
that old illustration using an egg (shell, yolk and white), but it seems
pretty weak. Anyone have a better one?

On 4/11/06, Dawsonzhu@aol.com <Dawsonzhu@aol.com> wrote:
David wrote:

If by "answer" you mean something completely emotionally or
intellectually satisfying, I guess you're right.

That is exactly what I meant. We know the doctrine, and it is one of
those
things we just accept/endure/take on faith, but to even try to explain
something
like that, well,.... good luck..... Sorry if that was confusing.

Also, thank you Michael for the heads up on "physical" and "bodily". I
agree completely. "Physical" does bring up that image of "Zombies",
"bodily" is a complete remake.

He has risen indeed,.... happy Easter.
Wayne
Received on Tue Apr 11 22:55:52 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 11 2006 - 22:55:52 EDT