I had mentioned: "...All the authors seem to be somewhat skittish of
process
>theology; at least this is my first impression."
Janice commented: "@ Maybe that's because they know that process theism
is just a
philosophical theology in the sense that it is not grounded in claims
of special insight or revealed truth but in philosophical
reflection."
I'd maybe phrase it differently. It is not because they "know," but
because they are firmly committed to the position that PT is incorrect
because it is a philosophy and not grounded in revealed truth."
Now I am not a PT pretty much for the same reasons. But my impression is
that the essayists in the book don't analyze this question.
I admit to only one reading of the book so far; I may come to a different
conclusion the second time through.
Burgy
Received on Tue Apr 4 12:28:55 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 04 2006 - 12:29:11 EDT