Re: Islam and Christianity, how great the contrast in history?

From: Don Winterstein <dfwinterstein@msn.com>
Date: Tue Oct 19 2004 - 12:28:42 EDT

ED: The "origins" of each [Christianity and Islam] remain disputed. As =
folks who have spent their
lives studying the issues can attest. Take Dr. James D. G. Dunn, who =
was
a fairly conservative Evangelical to start with, and then became a
moderate Evangelical and may still consider himself one, but admits in =
his
latest momumental work (JESUS REMEMBERED) that he is unable to prove a =
lot
that conservative Christians believe they can prove from the New =
Testament
Gospels....

Don: The origins are not so disputed that one might think they were =
similar. Mohammed was clearly very different from Jesus, and the way =
Jesus' message initially spread was very dissimilar to the way Islam =
initially spread. And I emphasized history, not just the holy book. =
History includes the Didache, writings of the church fathers, =
inscriptions in the catacombs, etc. (--as well as the Gospel of Thomas, =
etc.). The lesson, I think, is that God is in the big picture but never =
in the details. The more closely you look at anything, the less it =
looks like God. =20

If God could be proved in any way--such as through a numerical analysis =
of Genesis 1:1, or through some unmistakable evidence for intelligent =
design--then such proof would become a fetish or idol and people would =
fixate on it instead of on the Person. To some Christians the Bible =
seems to have become such an idol; to others, the relics of saints, etc. =
  Such misplacing of focus seems to be a common failing, one that I =
suspect God forgives more often than not. =20

ED: Peaceful? When Christianity was in control there apparently were
riots at one time or another in every major city of the Roman Empire,
Christian disputing with Christian, over religion. More Christians =
killed
Christians after Constantine become the first Roman Christian Emperor,
than during all of the previous persecutions of Christians under the
earlier Roman Emperors....=20

Don: Recall that I was talking about origins, when Christianity wasn't =
in control. Everyone knows shameful stories of atrocities that later =
Christians committed on one another and on outsiders. I'd never suggest =
that these stories testify properly of God any more than Muslim =
terrorists today testify properly of their Allah--although Islam in its =
earliest manifestations was much closer to physical violence than =
Christianity at a similar stage, and terrorists in certain respects can =
justifiably claim to be following the example of Mohammed. These =
atrocity stories simply indicate that religion can become superficial =
and, in some, evil. At that point it cannot be true religion. =20

>The NT after all, in contrast to the Qur'an, contains largely
>compatible records of events from multiple witnesses.=20

ED: Mark and Matthew are unsigned anonymous Gospels. Even later church
tradition does not say that Mark was a witness, nor Matthew....

Don: Recall that I didn't say who wrote them, or that their authors =
were eyewitnesses. However, it's evident that they were not all written =
by the same person, as the Qur'an, in contrast, was. For better or =
worse, one who accepts the Qur'an thus must put a lot more faith in the =
credibility of one man than one who accepts the NT. =20

ED:...the Catholic CDF (Congregation for
the Doctrine of the Faith) warned that certain forms of Eastern prayer
tempt people to try to overcome the necessary distance between creator =
and
creature....

Don: I suspect not many on this list believe there's any "necessary =
distance." I sure don't. =20

ED: ...Anagarika Dharmapala, a nineteenth century Buddhist, commented, =
"The
Nazarene carpenter had no sublime teachings to offer, and understandably
so, because his parables not only reveal a limited mind, but they also
impart immoral lessons and impractical ethics....

Don: This supports my suspicion that some revered Buddhists tend to be =
elitist snobs too good for everyone but themselves and slavish =
devotees--more interested in accruing personal adulation than in =
enlightening anyone, all under the guise of supreme humility. =
Otherwise, I found your tales of the East informative. =20

If I remember correctly, the current Dalai Lama professes a quite =
positive opinion of Jesus, calling him a Bodhisattva.

Don

=20
   From: ed babinski<mailto:ed.babinski@furman.edu>=20
   To: Don Winterstein<mailto:dfwinterstein@msn.com>=20
   Cc: asa<mailto:asa@calvin.edu>=20
   Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 4:15 PM
   Subject: Islam and Christianity, how great the contrast in history?

   "Don Winterstein" =
<dfwinterstein@msn.com<mailto:dfwinterstein@msn.com>> writes:
>The "holy book" is an important witness, but so is history. The =
contrast
>between the origin of Islam and the origin of Christianity is great. =

   ED: The "origins" of each remain disputed. As folks who have spent =
their
   lives studying the issues can attest. Take Dr. James D. G. Dunn, who =
was
   a fairly conservative Evangelical to start with, and then became a
   moderate Evangelical and may still consider himself one, but admits in =
his
   latest momumental work (JESUS REMEMBERED) that he is unable to prove a =
lot
   that conservative Christians believe they can prove from the New =
Testament
   Gospels. I have a list of Dunn's doubts if you'd like to see them, =
from
   his last two books. Or take Dr. Robert M. Price, former Evangelical
   inerrantist hellfire and brimstone breathing Baptist, but after being
   mentored by the inerrantist Clark Pinnock (member of the Soceity of
   Evangelical Christians), and after obtaining two Ph.D.s in New =
Testament,
   one in theology and another in N. T. history, and after reading enough
   books such that if the walls of his house fell down, his books alone =
would
   keep it standing, and after seeking to become the best Christian =
apologist
   he could, he grew to have his doubts too. More than Dunn, as you can =
read
   in Dr. Price's online book, BEYOND BORN AGAIN, and in his very latest
   work, that expresses even more doubts, THE INCREDIBLE SHRINKING SON OF
   GOD. I would of course add my own name and those fo the three dozen
   folks in LEAVING THE FOLD as well, or all the folks whose online
   testimonies are linked at Steve Locks' website, "Leaving =
Christianity." =20
   Or take the professors who are members of the Jesus Seminar, many of =
whom
   began their religious journeys at fundamentalist or evangelical
   institutions, and by wanting to prove the truth of Christian doctrines =
to
   the world, only to later grow to realize that there were more disputes
   than certainties in the Gospel stories.=20

   ---------------

>In the case of Islam, a man later known for his military campaigns =
got
>messages in trances. Islam owed much of its success right from the =
start
>to military prowess. =20

   ED: All of the MAJOR world religions owe much of their widespread
   advancement and growth to tying their ponies to Ceasar's chariot (and =
vice
   versa). Church and State together employed both the sword, and the
   carrot. I ecall reading that Constantine or some other Roman Christian
   emperors offered many converts a piece of gold and new robe. Not to
   mention the way Constantine and other Christian emperors after him
   lavished the wealth of Rome on the building of Christian churches and
   complexes.=20

   ---------------

>In the case of Christianity, a miracle worker of exemplary personal
>behavior was minimally involved with propagating his message outside =
his
>own community, but he so profoundly affected his unexceptional =
companions
>that they set his message well on the road to peaceful world
>domination despite a hostile environment. =20

   ED: It remains questionable exactly how "hostile" the environment was =
for
   the spread of Christianity. It was during an age when superstitions,
   miracle tales, tales of mysterious ascensions to heaven, tales of sons =
of
   god, and interest in the next life had increased greatly when compared
   with the earlier history of the Roman Empire which was more involved =
with
   armed expansion and practical affairs of state. It was an age of =
mystery
   religions. For the first hundred years of Christianity there were =
still
   more Mithraists than Christians, but Christianity was more egalitarian
   inviting everyone to join. Paul's home town, Tarsus, was named after =
a
   dying and rising god whose celebrations filled the streets during =
festival
   times. And Christianity was like paganism with more personal =
promises
   and more severe threats as well, for "not" believing. It was also an =
age
   of great roads that stretched throughout the Roman Empire, and an age =
of
   just a few major languages in that Empire, Greek being one of them, so
   many could be reached and understand. It was an age where there were
   synagoges throughout the Roman Empire, jumping off places for Paul and
   other Christians to stay at least briefly, and preach, and gather in a =
few
   souls to found their own separate Christian congregation. Taking all =
of
   that into consideration, Christianity was more of what people wanted =
in
   the world at that time and place.=20
   By the way, before Jesus was ever born, the Roman Emperor, Augustus, =
was
   believed by many to have been "born of a virgin," was called "son of =
God,"
   was said to have had a "gospel," and, "ascended into heaven" after he
   died. These ancient tales about Augustus are commonly known by Bible
   scholars to have preceded the writing of the Gospels.=20

   ------------------
>
>The New Testament and the peaceful historical impact of Jesus' =
message
>are likely to constitute as much objective proof of a religion's =
validity
>as we're ever going to get. =20

   ED: Peaceful? When Christianity was in control there apparently were
   riots at one time or another in every major city of the Roman Empire,
   Christian disputing with Christian, over religion. More Christians =
killed
   Christians after Constantine become the first Roman Christian Emperor,
   than during all of the previous persecutions of Christians under the
   earlier Roman Emperors. (Please don't be shy about asking me for
   references.)

   ------------------

>The NT after all, in contrast to the Qur'an, contains largely
>compatible records of events from multiple witnesses.=20

   ED: Mark and Matthew are unsigned anonymous Gospels. Even later =
church
   tradition does not say that Mark was a witness, nor Matthew. Luke =
admits
   right at the start that what follows is based on stories he had =
collected,
   again, not an eyewitness. The fourth Gospel, called, John, says in =
the
   final chapter that it was written by the "beloved apostle," unnamed, =
while
   the chapter right before the last chapter has its own ending, a prior
   ending before the last chapter was added. At the end of the =
penultimate
   chapter of the fourth Gospel, it does not say the "beloved apostle" =
wrote
   it, but an unnamed, "we," wrote it. Again, anonymous. The Gospel of =
John
   never says that "John" wrote it, nor does it say that John was "the
   beloved apostle." Moreover, over 90% of Mark is reproduced in =
Matthew
   and Luke. And Matthew and Luke also share a substantial amount of
   material between themselves as well. So it's not "multiple =
witnesses."=20
   It's "redactors" of verbal and written tales about Jesus.=20

   ----------------------

>As objective proofs go, it's still not terribly compelling.=20
>Nevertheless, as Howard Van Till was arguing earlier, it is possible =
to
>come up with objective criteria for evaluating religions. Just don't
>expect them ever to be definitive. The power of religion resides not =
in
>objective but in subjective proofs. =20

   ED: The "power of religion" is quite varied from snake handlers and =
hell
   raisers to speechless monks and quiet Quakers. In fact, I recently =
heard
   from a snake handler via email, since I'd written something about them =
at
   my website. He informed me that not only do they take the "signs" in =
the
   last chapter of Mark seriously, but also take the verses in Paul's
   epistles about "sharing a holy kiss" seriously. I had asked in an
   earlier aritcle why fundamentalists didn't form any church of the =
"holy
   kiss" when there were denominations based on less often repeated =
commands,
   like "Foot-Washing Baptists" and "Snake Handlers." Well, it appears =
some
   do take all of the "holy kiss" verses seriously! Though he admitted =
they
   kissed on the neck, or if it was your sister, on the cheek.=20

   --------------------

>Religions originating since NT times have acknowledged Jesus' virtue
>(e.g., Islam and LDS),

   ED: Smart move. Christians acknowledged the virtue of famous holy =
Jews in
   the Old Testament as well. Smart move when your religion claims to
   supercede the ones that had gone on before it. =20

   ---------------------

> and even modern Buddhists and Hindus are often forced to take a =
stand on
>Jesus. (A Hindu priest on Bali once told me that the Hindu trinity =
was
>theologically equivalent to the Christian Trinity, and all the other
>Hindu deities only represented different aspects of the one God.) =20

   ED: Speaking of stories that illustrate meeting points between East =
and
   West, I have a few to share:

   C. S. Lewis's long time friend and fellow Christian convert at Oxford,
   Bede Griffiths =
http://www.bedegriffiths.com/bio.htm<http://www.bedegriffiths.com/bio.htm=
>, founded a
   Christian-Hindu ashram in India and dialogued and meditated with =
Hindus
   and later defended misunderstandings and pigeon-holing of their =
beliefs
   and practices, even against Catholic statements warning people away =
from
   eastern religions. For instance when the Catholic CDF (Congregation =
for
   the Doctrine of the Faith) warned that certain forms of Eastern prayer
   tempt people to try to overcome the necessary distance between creator =
and
   creature, God and human kind, Griffiths responded in the National =
Catholic
   Reporter, "As if God in Christ had not already overcome that distance =
and
   united us with him in the closest bonds. St. Paul says, 'You who were =
far
   off, he has brought near -- not kept distant -- in the blood of =
Christ.'
   Jesus himself totally denies any such distance, 'I am the vine, ' he =
says,
   'you are the branches.' How can the branches be 'distant' from the =
vine?"
   ... The CDF also warned, "We must never in any way seek to place =
ourselves
   on the same level as the object of our contemplation." To which =
Griffiths
   responded, "It is God who has already places us there. Jesus says, 'I =
have
   not called you servant, but friends.' And to show what such friendship
   mean, he prays for his discoiples, 'that they may be one, as thou, =
Father
   in me and I in thee, that they may be one in us.'" Griffiths was also =
one
   of C. S. Lewis's most prolific and long-time correspondents, and =
Griffiths
   even got Lewis to admit, "Even more disturbing as you [Griffiths] say, =
is
   the ghastly record of Christian persecution. It had begun in Our =
Lord's
   time - 'Ye know not what spirit ye are of' (John of all people!). I =
think
   we must fully face the fact that when Christianity does not make a man
   very much better, it makes him very much worse...Conversion may make =
of
   one who was, if no better, no worse than an animal, something like a
   devil." [C. S. Lewis in a letter to Bede Griffiths, dated Dec. 20, =
1961,
   not long before Lewis' death, The Letters of C. S. Lewis, ed., W. H.
   Lewis, (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1966), p. 301.]

   Devout Christians, like Dom Bede Griffiths, as well as Thomas Merton, =
and
   others, have found deep heartfelt correspondences between Eastern and
   Western spirituality love and humilty. Here's some suggested reading:

   1) The Courage of Conviction: Thirty-Three Prominent Men and Women =
Reveal
   Their Beliefs - And How They Put Those Beliefs Into Practice, edited =
by
   Phillip L. Berman (the beliefs and convictions of Billy Graham, the =
Dalai
   Lama, Andrew Greeley, Harold Kushner, et al.)

   2) Once-Born Twice-Born Zen by Conrad Hyers (about a school of Zen
   Buddhism whose descriptions of "satori" resemble being "born again").

   3) The Inner Eye of Love by Robert Johnson (a Catholic in Japan =
compares
   Christian agape love with Buddhist karnua compassion; and compares
   devotion to Christ with devotion to the compassionate Amida Buddha).

   4) The Marriage of East and West, and, The Cosmic Revelation: The =
Hindu
   Way to God by Dom Bede Griffiths (a Catholic who founded a =
Christian-Hindu
   ashram in India, who was also a close friend of C. S. Lewis, talks =
about
   his inter-religious discoveries).

   5) The Laughing Buddha: Zen and the Comic Spirit by Conrad Hyers (the
   universality of comedic grace in the world's religions is the theme of
   many of Hyers' works). Furthermore, though the exclusivistic "world" =
view
   of many hard-line evangelicals leaves no room for Hinduism, yet for
   millions of devout Hindus there remains room for Christianity and =
Christ's
   divinity. Hinduism in that sense encompasses a wider range of faith =
than
   Christianity. There are even what one might call "fundamentalist" =
Hindus,
   like the one who asked Joseph Campbell, "What do scholars think of the
   Vedas [the most ancient Hindu holy books]?" Campbell answered, "The =
dating
   of the Vedas has been reduced to 1500 to 1000 B.C., and there have =
been
   found in India itself the remains of an earlier civilization than the
   Vedic." "Yes," said the Indian gentleman, "I know; but as an orthodox
   Hindu I cannot believe that there is anything in the universe earlier =
than
   the Vedas." It's obvious that the study of the world's holy books by
   historical, archeological and literary scholars continues to provoke
   tension and discomfort in "Vedic believing" Hindus, "Koran believing"
   Moslems, and "Bible believing" Christians. So there is nothing =
"unique"
   about "Bible believing" Christians in that respect.=20

   Furthermore, there are millions of devout Hindus more moved by the =
story
   of Krishna in the Hindu holy book, The Bhagavad Gita, than by the =
story of
   Jesus. As one Indian Catholic priest candidly told a British =
journalist,
   "Although my family had been Christians for generations and I had been
   through the full rigors of a Jesuit training, I still, in my heart of
   hearts, feel closer to the God Krishna than to Jesus." (In Indian =
courts
   of law, people swear with their hand on The Bhagavad Gita not the =
Bible,
   and there are even popular Indian books with titles like, The =
Bhagavada
   Gita for Executives by V. Ramanathan.)=20

   There are also millions of devout Buddhists more moved by stories of =
the
   Buddha and his disciples than by stories of Jesus and his disciples.
   Anagarika Dharmapala, a nineteenth century Buddhist, commented, "The
   Nazarene carpenter had no sublime teachings to offer, and =
understandably
   so, because his parables not only reveal a limited mind, but they also
   impart immoral lessons and impractical ethics...The few illiterate
   fishermen of Galilee followed him as he promised to make them judges =
to
   rule over Israel [appealing to relatively 'base' desires according to
   Buddhist teachings - ED.]." To such Buddhists, "Jesus is a spiritual =
dwarf
   before Buddha, the spiritual giant."=20

   Oddly enough, one version of the Buddha's life that reached Europe =
from
   India underwent subtle changes along the way, until the Buddha became =
a
   Christian saint! According to that version the "prince" who "lived in
   India" was named "Josaphat," and he was a "Great Renouncer." Research =
into
   the origins of "Saint Josaphat," revealed that the Latin name, =
"Josaphat,"
   was based on an earlier version of the story in which the Greek name
   "Ioasaph" was used, which came from the Arabic "Yudasaf," which came =
from
   the Manichee "Bodisaf," which came from "Bodhisattva" in the original
   story of the Buddha. "Bodhisattva" is a person who achieves great
   spiritual enlightenment yet remains on earth to help others.) Thus the
   Buddha came to be included in Butler's Lives of the Saints.=20

   Also, some of the earliest Jesuit missionaries to China, who read the =
Far
   Eastern book of wisdom, the Tao Te Ching, returned to Rome and =
requested
   that that book be added to the Bible, because it contained teachings =
on
   non-violence, love and humility that paralleled and preceded Jesus'
   teachings by hundreds of years. (Many of those parallels are commented =
on
   in The Tao of Jesus: An Exercise in Inter-Traditional Understanding by
   Joseph A. Loya, O.S.A, Wan-Li Ho, and Chang-Shin Jih.) Eastern =
religions
   also feature stories of miracles and visions, along with stories of
   saintly Hindus and Buddhists who died beautifully and serenely. In =
some
   cases a sweet flowery odor is said to have come from their corpses. In
   another case a corpse allegedly turned into flowers at death. All in =
all,
   the stories rival those of Catholic saints and their miracles. In =
fact,
   "sainthood" is a phenomenon common to all the world's religions.=20

   Also interesting is the fact that the 1996 winner of the Templeton =
Prize
   for Progress in Religion was Bill Bright, founder of Campus Crusade =
for
   Christ. But the very next year the winner was A HINDU, Shastri =
Athavale,
   whose spiritual and SOCIAL ACTIVISM was inspired by the The Bhagavad =
Gita.
   Athavale has inspired hundreds of thousands of people to spend two =
weeks
   or more visiting India's poorest villages where they seek to advance =
the
   self-respect and economic condition of those they visit. For more than
   four decades Athavale has taught that service to God is incomplete =
without
   service to humanity.
Received on Tue Oct 19 13:46:27 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 13:46:30 EDT