Re: Who's Burden of Proof?

From: Howard J. Van Till <hvantill@chartermi.net>
Date: Fri Nov 28 2003 - 08:19:37 EST

>From: "Steve Petermann" <steve@spetermann.org>

> The burden of proof that there is no designer should fall on those who
> reject this inference.

Steve,

I know of no person on this list who argues against the existence of a
designer. So, the invitation quoted above is unlikely to generate meaningful
debate.

Howard Van Till
Received on Fri Nov 28 08:23:56 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dick Fischer: "Re: Carbonate deposition (formerly oil, etc.)"
Previous message: bpayne15@juno.com: "Re: Carbonate deposition (formerly oil, etc.)"
Maybe in reply to: Steve Petermann: "Who's Burden of Proof?"
Next in thread: Steve Petermann: "Re: Who's Burden of Proof?"
Reply: Steve Petermann: "Re: Who's Burden of Proof?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 28 2003 - 08:23:58 EST