From: Michael Roberts (michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk)
Date: Tue Nov 11 2003 - 16:49:06 EST
I am sorry if you dont follow what I am concerned about. However I do not
see any rational connection between natural processses only dealing with a
few bits of information and humans which can deal with lots of info.
In my reponse I asked for details of your empirical work and experiments as
I consider what you write to be thought experiments rather than real
experiments.
Now are you able to specify the experiments you have done and if so where
are they published?
Are you unable to answer my serious questions then?
.
Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: "NSS" <kirk@newscholars.com>
To: "Michael Roberts" <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>; <asa@calvin.edu>;
"Denyse O'Leary" <oleary@sympatico.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: Kirk Durston's response
> On 11/11/03 1:09 PM, "Michael Roberts" <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> >> 2) In our observations of this world, we notice that intelligent
agents,
> >> such as humans, can produce vast amounts of functional information.
> >
> > So waht!
> >>
>
> From Mr. Robert's inserted comments, I see no reason to believe that he is
> actually interested in thinking critically about this issue. Regretfully,
I
> do not have time to engage in discussions with people who will not think
and
> do not have the motivation to educate themselves to at least the level of
> being able to carry on an intelligent conversation on this issue.
>
> Preston asked an honest question, and I would be happy to respond to any
> further clarification or questions that he may desire, but I will not be
> able to take the time to engage in the level of interaction that Mr.
Roberts
> feels obligated to practice.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kirk
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 11 2003 - 17:08:40 EST