From: Walter Hicks (wallyshoes@mindspring.com)
Date: Wed Nov 05 2003 - 22:35:25 EST
George Hammond wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I can't remember if i got thrown off this list a few years ago
> or left in a huff. Anyway it's water under the bridge.
>
> If you remember I'm the physicist who discovered a scientific
> proof of God. Well, after being rejected for publication by
> Zygon (who reviewed it for 10 weeks and apparently
> couldn't understand it)... it has presently been accepted
> by a Physics Journal, the Noetic Journal, and will appear this
> month.
>
> Meanwhile, for your convenience a new 4 page
> illustrated, large print, website has been posted where you
> can read all about it, at:
>
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> or
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
>
> If there are any PhD level physicists among you who
> have any comment about this, I'd be glad to
> hear any (non-argumentative/constructive)
> comments. Arguments will have to be reserved
> for the peer reviewed literature.
Now this is a great idea! Instead of argumentative comments, we can
have Terry make a rule like this for all future ASA posts. In that
way, there will be no more hostility between list members. No more
arrogance, no more snits and no more list cancellations out of anger.
What a wonderful list ASA will become.
Great idea, George. keep up the good work.
Walt
Oh yes, I almost forgot.
I am one of the ASAers who has a Ph.D. in Physics.
All non-argumentative/constructive comments that I have are included
in this post.
-- =================================== Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>In any consistent theory, there must exist true but not provable statements. (Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 05 2003 - 22:37:11 EST