From: Dawsonzhu@aol.com
Date: Sat Nov 01 2003 - 06:23:53 EST
Allen Roy wrote:
> All of it [the "explanations" above] are nothing
> but pure rationalization needed
> to try to save the fatally flawed methodology. As Woodmorappe says, "CMBN"
> --
> If it works, Credit Methodology, it if doesn't, Blame Nature to save
> methodology. If it doesn't work here, why should it work somewhere else?
> Why
> trust it anywhere?
>
OK, good, so we have one (possible) and interesting exception and 100s
of examples that work. You now blow up this one example into a
big mountain and claim that therefore NONE can be true (except of course
those
that meet your catastrophic flood theory model --- those of course are ok).
And if a sound explanation comes forward we have 100s + 1 more out of zero,
will
you apply the same statement about "rationalizations" to yourself?
Just wondering.
by Grace alone we proceed,
Wayne
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2003 - 06:26:29 EST