From: Steve Petermann (steve@spetermann.org)
Date: Fri Sep 26 2003 - 10:36:29 EDT
> Who are "the Darwinians"? This is an ID designation, so what do
> they/you mean by "the Darwinians"? Is this intended to include all
> evolutionary biologists? Does it mean only "the extreme gradualists"
Howard
> understands the term to mean in ID-speak? Who are you talking about?
Ok. Non-telic evolutionists.
Steve Petermann
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Schneider" <rjschn39@bellsouth.net>
To: "Steve Petermann" <steve@spetermann.org>
Cc: "ASA" <asa@lists.calvin.edu>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: RFEP & ID
> Steve wrote:
>
> > Don wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > I have gained the impression that if anyone can develop an ID
scientific
> > research program then Mike will be the one to do it. However, he is
> > obviously
> > not a typical ID proponent of the Johnson-Behe-Dembski variety.
> > <<<<<<<<<<
> >
> > I agree that Mike's attitude is what is needed. However, although
Dembski
> > is obviously contentious at times, the following statement is, imo, an
> > example of the attitude that true theorists adopt. Will the Darwinians
> make
> > the same statement?
> >
> >
> >
> Bob's question:
>
> Who are "the Darwinians"? This is an ID designation, so what do
> they/you mean by "the Darwinians"? Is this intended to include all
> evolutionary biologists? Does it mean only "the extreme gradualists"
Howard
> understands the term to mean in ID-speak? Who are you talking about?
>
> Bob Schneider
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 26 2003 - 10:39:13 EDT