Re: Tit for Tat?

From: George Murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Thu Sep 11 2003 - 07:43:59 EDT

  • Next message: Ted Davis: "Re: Tit for Tat?"

    allenroy wrote:
    >
    > We've been hearing how unethical it is for YEC to cast doubt on the
    > christian spirituality of OECs and TEs. How about the other way around?
    >
    > Does Hugh Ross imply in the following that YECs might be in spiritual
    > jeopardy?
    >
    > >From http://www.reasons.org/resources/apologetics/trap.shtml?main
    >
    > Humphreys' and other 24-hour-day creationists' interpretation of Genesis
    > inadvertently leads to the suggestion that God is the one who deceives. ...................................

            Note here the word "inadvertently." To say that some Christians are
    well-meaning but wrong & that propagation of their views misleads people is rather
    different from saying (e.g.) that a pastor who accepts evolution must just be in the
    ministry for the money. The latter was the clear implication of one criticism levelled
    at me for an article I wrote several years ago.

                                                                    Shalom,
                                                                    George
                                    

    George L. Murphy
    gmurphy@raex.com
    http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Sep 11 2003 - 07:50:51 EDT