From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Wed Sep 10 2003 - 13:48:28 EDT
In a message dated 9/10/03 1:42:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
dickfischer@earthlink.net writes:
> . For those new to the list, the argument for a historic, neolithic Adam
> is on the ASA web page: "In Search of the Historical Adam, Part 1 and Part 2."
>
>
Also, there is another perspective that suggests the story of Adam and Eve is
allegorical. For that perspective, request - True Religion, The Darwinian
Interpretation of Biblical Symbols from me (a word.doc).
rich faussette
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Sep 10 2003 - 13:50:47 EDT