From: Lawrence Johnston (johnston@uidaho.edu)
Date: Sun Aug 31 2003 - 09:01:54 EDT
Terry - Please count me as a "NO". I assume the subject is
Macroevolution, not Microevolution.
Lawrence Johnston, Ph.D. Physics, from UC Berkeley 1950
Retired from Physics, U of Idaho 1988
=======================================================
Lawrence H. Johnston home: 917 E. 8th st.
professor of physics, emeritus Moscow, Id 83843
University of Idaho (208) 882-2765
Fellow of the American Physical Society
http://www.uidaho.edu/~johnston/homepage.html =========
-------------------------------------------------------------
Date sent: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:34:59 -0600
From: "Terry M. Gray" <grayt@lamar.colostate.edu>
Subject: Poll results so far (2) [7 yes - 2 no]
To: asa@calvin.edu
> Three more people have responded to the poll. We're at 7/9 yes, 2/9 no.
>
> Here are the poll results so far with Ph.D. institution and major listed.
>
> Question: In your judgment, is biological evolution a well established theory?
>
> YES UNC-Chapel Hill - Paleobiology
> YES Minnesota - Biochemistry
> YES Washington University-St. Louis - Population/Evolutionary Biology
> YES UC-Berkeley - Biological Psychology
> YES Michigan State - Biochemistry
> YES University of Oregon - Molecular Biology
> NO Swiss Federal Institute of Technology - Biochemistry
> NO Illinois-Champaign-Urbana - Plant Biology
> YES Iowa State - Entomology
>
> Plus a YES from someone with a soon-to-be-awarded Ph.D.
>
> A few of these have responded to my call for a definition. I'll
> compile those definitions and post them shortly.
>
> The poll is still open.
>
> TG
>
> --
> _________________
> Terry M. Gray, Ph.D., Computer Support Scientist
> Chemistry Department, Colorado State University
> Fort Collins, Colorado 80523
> grayt@lamar.colostate.edu http://www.chm.colostate.edu/~grayt/
> phone: 970-491-7003 fax: 970-491-1801
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 31 2003 - 09:03:40 EDT