Re: methodological naturalism

From: douglas.hayworth@perbio.com
Date: Fri Aug 29 2003 - 08:50:43 EDT

  • Next message: Don Winterstein: "Re: Intuition in science"

    Regarding MN, I recall a previous exchange that I had on this list in July
    of 2000 (http://www.asa3.org/archive/asa/200007/0104.html). I think that a
    simple example clearly demonstrates the usefulness and validity of MN in
    science. Here's what I said then:

    "I find the idea of a "theistic natural science" to be an oxymoron, like
    "spiritual car mechanic". When I go to have my car fixed, I want a
    mechanic who is methodologically a naturalist; he rightfully assumes to the

    bitter end that there is a physical basis for the problem. If he never
    finds one, and God somehow miraculously makes the problem goes away, I
    thank God. For me,
    having faith that God will provide, it was a miracle, a special provision
    in a time of need. If the mechanic finds a problem and fixes it, I also
    thank God, and trust Him to provide for me to pay for the work. By either
    outcome, I want the mechanic to be a relentless methodological naturalist
    (and, significantly, I give thanks to God for his purpose in my life). If
    my mechanic is a Christian, that's all the better; but only in the sense
    that he will (hopefully) have a higher level of integrity and tenacity in
    solving my car problem, i.e., his Christianity makes him a better
    methodological naturalist. As a Christian, he will also be able to share
    in my experience of provision."

    Doug



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Aug 29 2003 - 08:58:23 EDT