From: Jay Willingham (jaywillingham@cfl.rr.com)
Date: Thu Aug 21 2003 - 11:42:13 EDT
> On the empirical side, the human DNA recently regarded as "junk " is now
not
> thought to not be so.
>
> We are only scratching to surface of this area of study.
>
> Applications of gene identification to prove evolutionary theory are
> hypothetical at best.
>
> By the way, I believe in natural selection as changing species perhaps
> enough to call them new species, although classification is as much art as
> science. I do not believe those processes explain the origin of life or
> even of the genera.
>
> Jay
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Josh Bembenek" <jbembe@hotmail.com>
> To: <jaywillingham@cfl.rr.com>; <asa@calvin.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 11:17 AM
> Subject: Re: Student perceptions re evolution
>
>
> > Jay-
> >
> > >Gene interpretation is not so firm a fact as the existence of fossils
> and
> > >the Grand Canyon.
> >
> >
> > Since this is part of my job, can you explain what you mean by this?
> > Expound a little.
> >
> >
> > Josh
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > <b>Get MSN 8</b> and help protect your children with advanced parental
> > controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Aug 21 2003 - 11:43:47 EDT