Re: apparently conflicting biblical statements

From: Jay Willingham (jaywillingham@cfl.rr.com)
Date: Sat Aug 16 2003 - 09:56:34 EDT

  • Next message: Walter Hicks: "Re: Darwin quote"

    Sorry 'bout dat!

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Walter Hicks" <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
    To: "Jay Willingham" <jaywillingham@cfl.rr.com>
    Cc: "ASA" <asa@calvin.edu>
    Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 7:56 AM
    Subject: Re: apparently conflicting biblical statements

    > Hi,
    >
    > I had to go back to my original email to get the context. The
    > complete sentence was : "Based upon your experience from this
    > viewpoint, how do you envision evolution and what do
    > make of apparently conflicting biblical statements. "
    >
    > I was intending to contrast the biblical account of the
    > creation of Adam and Eve versus the the current view of
    > evolution of mankind. It was not intended to imply any
    > inconsistency in the Bible or give any opinion of my own.
    >
    > Walt
    >
    >
    > Jay Willingham wrote:
    >
    > > > Which statements would those be?
    > > >
    > > > Jay
    > > >
    > > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > > From: "Walter Hicks" <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
    > > > what do (you)
    > > > > make of apparently conflicting biblical statements? >
    > > > >
    > > >
    >
    > --
    > ===================================
    > Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
    >
    > In any consistent theory, there must
    > exist true but not provable statements.
    > (Godel's Theorem)
    >
    > You can only find the truth with logic
    > If you have already found the truth
    > without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
    > ===================================
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 16 2003 - 09:57:58 EDT