From: Jay Willingham (jaywillingham@cfl.rr.com)
Date: Sat Aug 16 2003 - 09:56:34 EDT
Sorry 'bout dat!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walter Hicks" <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
To: "Jay Willingham" <jaywillingham@cfl.rr.com>
Cc: "ASA" <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: apparently conflicting biblical statements
> Hi,
>
> I had to go back to my original email to get the context. The
> complete sentence was : "Based upon your experience from this
> viewpoint, how do you envision evolution and what do
> make of apparently conflicting biblical statements. "
>
> I was intending to contrast the biblical account of the
> creation of Adam and Eve versus the the current view of
> evolution of mankind. It was not intended to imply any
> inconsistency in the Bible or give any opinion of my own.
>
> Walt
>
>
> Jay Willingham wrote:
>
> > > Which statements would those be?
> > >
> > > Jay
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Walter Hicks" <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
> > > what do (you)
> > > > make of apparently conflicting biblical statements? >
> > > >
> > >
>
> --
> ===================================
> Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
>
> In any consistent theory, there must
> exist true but not provable statements.
> (Godel's Theorem)
>
> You can only find the truth with logic
> If you have already found the truth
> without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
> ===================================
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 16 2003 - 09:57:58 EDT