From: Glenn Morton (glennmorton@entouch.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 2003 - 18:52:43 EDT
Sorry to have misread your note, Josh. But I read your part of that twice to
see if Sarah's interp was correct. I felt it read that way. I am glad to be
corrected.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Josh Bembenek [mailto:jbembe@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:11 AM
>To: glennmorton@entouch.net; sec@hal-pc.org; asa@calvin.edu
>Subject: RE: Fibbonacci and other mathematical patterns in shells
>
>
>Sarah and Glenn-
>
>Some members of this list are beginning to develop an extraordinarily bad
>reading/comprehension problem. Just a while ago I talked about a
>HYPOTHESIS
>and everyone jumped on me for talking about PROOFs. In this example, I
>asked a question about what it takes to support a claim that something is
>NOT CAUSED by intelligent intervention (because Old Seashells made an
>unproven assertion of his personal faith stance on the subject), and
>everyone responds back about whatever it might take to make the claim that
>something IS CAUSED by intelligent intervention. I can discuss
>the veracity
>of a negative claim without having to prove the inverse. If you
>read again
>what I wrote, I never stated that any feature of shells, fibonacci
>patterns,
>or anything else is the product of ID in that post. If you had been
>previously attentive to the conversations you would have seen the
>following:
>
>http://www.calvin.edu/archive/asa/200308/0109.html
>
>Confused,
>
>Josh
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 13 2003 - 18:52:55 EDT