Re: Sin?

From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Mon Aug 11 2003 - 14:17:37 EDT

  • Next message: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: Sin?"

    In a message dated 8/10/03 10:13:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
    jwburgeson@juno.com writes:

    > With such a broad definition, of course, one must
    > accept the word "heterosexuality" in the same way, and so, neither you
    > nor I were "heterosexual" until our first sexual experience with a
    >

    I have to qualify this. The orientation arrives before the coupling, so on
    the face of it, your remark is false.
    rich



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 11 2003 - 14:19:05 EDT