Re: Sin?

From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Thu Aug 07 2003 - 13:53:24 EDT

  • Next message: RFaussette@aol.com: "RE: suffering"

    In a message dated 8/7/03 1:35:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time, gmurphy@raex.com
    writes:

    > But it gives a distorted picture of what the asa list is
    > supposed to be to continue threads which often have nothing to do with
    > science.

    The thread on homosexuality is continuing because the liberals don't argue,
    they pontificate. The tradionalists want argument, rational scientific
    argument. They're not getting it. I've gleaned your sentiment from the threads, but
    haven't seen a good argument yet except some people want to be homosexual or
    condone homosexuality. That's not an argument. It's not science.
    Why bother with ID? I've been to the ISCID forums and abandoned them because
    they're silly. It's not science and it's not religion, but I appropriately
    stay out of the ID thread here. I don't suggest the thread be stopped.

    rich faussette



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 13:53:49 EDT