From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Mon Jun 30 2003 - 18:38:53 EDT
In a message dated 6/29/03 8:56:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
gbrown@euclid.colorado.edu writes:
> Physical and emotional health are benefits of sexual morality, and they
> may sometimes be used to dissuade people from sexual sins, but I don't
> think they are the primary reasons for the Lord's commands in this area.
> The principles Jesus mentioned in His teaching on the subject were
> different. If we assumed that health was the issue, then what would we say
> to someone who claimed to be able to practice safe sex?
>
>
We'd say they were kidding themselves.
"Safe" is an absolute. It does not mean "relatively" safe. The condoms being
distributed in many schools are only relatively (%wise effective) safe.
Monogamous couples practice safe sex.
rich faussette
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 30 2003 - 18:39:11 EDT