Re: Concordist sequence--why be a concordist?

From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Wed Jun 25 2003 - 18:28:30 EDT

Next message: George Murphy: "Re: the tradition that Abraham engaged in astronomical studies"

Previous message: RFaussette@aol.com: "the tradition that Abraham engaged in astronomical studies"
Maybe in reply to: Ted Davis: "Re: Concordist sequence--why be a concordist?"
Next in thread: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Concordist sequence--why be a concordist?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 6/25/03 1:21:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
jaywillingham@cfl.rr.com writes:

>
> >> I'm wondering now if this also represents the views of persons on this
>> list
>> who take a similar concordist approach -- arguing that the the results of
>> the empirical natural sciences provide support for the Bible, when properly
>> interpreted.
>>
>> Anyone else care to comment?
>>
>>
>
>
> I agree with the position above stated.
>
> Jay Willingham, Esquire
>
>
>

Yes

rich faussette

Next message: George Murphy: "Re: the tradition that Abraham engaged in astronomical studies"
Previous message: RFaussette@aol.com: "the tradition that Abraham engaged in astronomical studies"
Maybe in reply to: Ted Davis: "Re: Concordist sequence--why be a concordist?"
Next in thread: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Concordist sequence--why be a concordist?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 25 2003 - 18:30:19 EDT