Re: Concordist sequence--why be a concordist?

From: Howard J. Van Till (hvantill@chartermi.net)
Date: Wed Jun 25 2003 - 07:55:04 EDT

  • Next message: George Murphy: "Re: Concordist sequence--why be a concordist?"

    Ted,

    Thanks for the excerpts from Hitchcock re his reasons for adopting a
    concordist strategy in relating the Bible and science (especially geology).

    Your summary was:

    > (1) Why be a concordist? Short answer: it's a great spiritual benefit to
    > have geology support Genesis.

    I'm wondering now if this also represents the views of persons on this list
    who take a similar concordist approach -- arguing that the the results of
    the empirical natural sciences provide support for the Bible, when properly
    interpreted.

    Anyone else care to comment?

    Howard Van Till

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 25 2003 - 08:27:29 EDT