Re: Theological theory evaluation (Was: The forgotten verses)

From: Terry M. Gray (grayt@lamar.colostate.edu)
Date: Tue Jun 17 2003 - 23:05:41 EDT

  • Next message: Terry M. Gray: "Re: Nicene Creed"

    > >From: "Iain Strachan" <iain.strachan.asa@ntlworld.com>
    >
    >> Having read all these [statements of faith] , I don't necessarily
    >>think it's a
    >question of what
    >> your priorities are as to where you put God and Jesus with respect to the
    >> authority of Scripture. Some sort of statement on the authority of
    >> Scripture, even if it doesn't mean inerrancy, is almost axiomatic & it makes
    >> logical sense to state your axioms first for clarity before making the main
    >> point (perhaps).
    >
    >Interesting comment, which raises a question:
    >
    >How many on this list think of your set of Christian beliefs as an axiomatic
    >system derived from an authoritative text?
    >
    >Here's another way to put the question, drawn from occasional discussion on
    >the issue of fruitful criteria for evaluating scientific theories:
    >
    >How many on this list would identify "derivable from the designated
    >authoritative text" as one of the primary evaluation criteria for the
    >evaluation of theological theories?

    Count me in on this one. That's what the authority and sufficiency of
    scripture means in my mind.

    TG

    -- 
    _________________
    Terry M. Gray, Ph.D., Computer Support Scientist
    Chemistry Department, Colorado State University
    Fort Collins, Colorado  80523
    grayt@lamar.colostate.edu  http://www.chm.colostate.edu/~grayt/
    phone: 970-491-7003 fax: 970-491-1801
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jun 17 2003 - 23:06:35 EDT