RE: The forgotten verses

From: Debbie Mann (deborahjmann@insightbb.com)
Date: Mon Jun 16 2003 - 15:18:49 EDT

  • Next message: Debbie Mann: "The forgotten verses"

    I just sent a couple of vs. yesterday about what it claims to be. II Tim
    3:16 - all is inspired by God. I think the big question is what is
    'scripture' and who says so. Why don't we accept the Apocrypha or The Gospel
    of Thomas? I'm not asking for a history lesson - I've heard that. I'm asking
    about what those 'experts' used to decide and how valid it was.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
    Behalf Of Walter Hicks
    Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:57 AM
    To: Howard J. Van Till
    Cc: asa@calvin.edu
    Subject: Re: The forgotten verses

    Is there anywhere in the Bible where it claims it's own inerrancy? I know,
    for
    example, that RC Pope has declared himself to be infallible wrt matters of
    faith
    and morals. But, I have never heard of any clear cut claim of inerrancy
    specifically made in the Bible. All that seems to be based upon inference
    and
    "logic".

    Walt

    "Howard J. Van Till" wrote:

    > >From: Walter Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
    >
    > >
    > > Has anyone advanced the notion that the Bible may be wrong in some
    places?
    > >
    >
    > Yes, that idea has occurred to many people. In major portions of the
    > Christian community, however, that would be considered heresy of the
    highest
    > order. For such folk, protecting the Bible from this form of critical
    > examination is given top priority. Recall a suggestion I have made here
    > before -- look at the 'statement of faith' portion of creationist or other
    > conservative Christian web sites and note how often the very first
    statement
    > is a declaration about biblical inerrancy, followed later in the list by
    > statements about God and Jesus. Priorities are interesting things.
    >
    > Howard Van Till

    --
    ===================================
    Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
    

    In any consistent theory, there must exist true but not provable statements. (Godel's Theorem)

    You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 16 2003 - 15:17:24 EDT