Re: Terrible history or just terrible lizards?

From: bivalve (bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com)
Date: Tue Jun 10 2003 - 11:32:35 EDT

Next message: Iain Strachan: "Re: The forgotten verses"

Previous message: Michael Roberts: "Re: Terrible history or just terrible lizards?"
Maybe in reply to: bivalve: "Terrible history or just terrible lizards?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Thanks! My cynicism about popular history is justified.

>On the review, I am not sure what you are saying. In the 1820s most involved in geology were old earth and accepted Extinction though most rejected evolution.<

This is not the impression that one would get from the review, but I was not certain whether the book or just the reviewer was at fault.

    Dr. David Campbell
    Old Seashells
    University of Alabama
    Biodiversity & Systematics
    Dept. Biological Sciences
    Box 870345
    Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0345 USA
    bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com

That is Uncle Joe, taken in the masonic regalia of a Grand Exalted Periwinkle of the Mystic Order of Whelks-P.G. Wodehouse, Romance at Droitgate Spa

Next message: Iain Strachan: "Re: The forgotten verses"
Previous message: Michael Roberts: "Re: Terrible history or just terrible lizards?"
Maybe in reply to: bivalve: "Terrible history or just terrible lizards?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jun 10 2003 - 11:24:52 EDT