Re: "Design up to Scratch?" (The Wit and Wisdom of Michael Roberts)

From: Howard J. Van Till (hvantill@chartermi.net)
Date: Mon Apr 28 2003 - 13:50:22 EDT

Next message: Josh Bembenek: "Re: "Design up to Scratch?" (The Wit and Wisdom of Michael Roberts)"

Previous message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: ID science (subtopic 2)"
Maybe in reply to: Dick Fischer: ""Design up to Scratch?" (The Wit and Wisdom of Michael Roberts)"
Next in thread: Josh Bembenek: "Re: "Design up to Scratch?" (The Wit and Wisdom of Michael Roberts)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I have a small question for Josh.

George had asked: "Is the carbon-12 nucleus intelligently designed?"

Josh answered: "Yes C12 is designed...."

My question is, Why did you (Josh) change the terminology from
"intelligently designed" to just "designed"? Was that an intentional choice?
If so, what was the operative intention?

Howard Van Till

Next message: Josh Bembenek: "Re: "Design up to Scratch?" (The Wit and Wisdom of Michael Roberts)"
Previous message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: ID science (subtopic 2)"
Maybe in reply to: Dick Fischer: ""Design up to Scratch?" (The Wit and Wisdom of Michael Roberts)"
Next in thread: Josh Bembenek: "Re: "Design up to Scratch?" (The Wit and Wisdom of Michael Roberts)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 28 2003 - 14:19:27 EDT