Re: science got us to the moon - then we found out the science was wrong?

From: John Burgeson (burgythree@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Jan 26 2003 - 16:22:16 EST

Next message: John Burgeson: "RE: An interesting essay for evangelicals"

Previous message: Jim Eisele: "Get used to Christianity in the past tense"
Next in thread: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: science got us to the moon - then we found out the science was wrong?"
Maybe reply: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: science got us to the moon - then we found out the science was wrong?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>>You didn't read the post and didn't reproduce the lines preceding this>>

I did read the whole post. I did not reproduce the preceding lines because
they were irrelevant to the argument.

None of my gay or lesbian friends have any desire to modify Xtianity.
Perhaps some do -- I have not encountered them or their arguments.

John W. Burgeson (Burgy)
www.burgy.50megs.com

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

Next message: John Burgeson: "RE: An interesting essay for evangelicals"
Previous message: Jim Eisele: "Get used to Christianity in the past tense"
Next in thread: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: science got us to the moon - then we found out the science was wrong?"
Maybe reply: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: science got us to the moon - then we found out the science was wrong?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jan 26 2003 - 16:23:53 EST