From: Cmekve@aol.com
Date: Tue Jan 14 2003 - 21:09:56 EST
Burgy-
For what it's worth, the Jan. 7 Washington Post reported that the Danish
Research Agency (the equivalent of our National Academy of Science) had
denounced Lomborg for "scientific dishonesty".
See http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24584-2003Jan7.html
Karl
*******************
Karl V. Evans
cmekve@aol.com
In a message dated 1/13/03 8:25:03 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
burgytwo@juno.com writes:
<< I have placed on my website, page 6. links to an ongoing controversy
between the Scientific American and one Bjorn Lomberg. The debate reminds
me of the "15 points" debate Sci-AM took on a few weeks ago.
Glenn -- do you have any input for us on this controversy?
I have also updated the material on the course I am teaching through week
2. Today's session was on the relationship between science and religion,
ethical reasoning, and a 40 minute discussion of the ethics in three
cases of death.
John Burgeson
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 23:43:59 EST