RE: Herodotus' Mice and the need for historical verification

• Previous message: Jan de Koning: "Re: I'm tired of posts with no specifics (was "Conservative")"
• Maybe in reply to: Glenn Morton: "Herodotus' Mice and the need for historical verification"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Burgy wrote:
>-----Original Message-----
>From: J Burgeson [mailto:hoss_radbourne@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 9:49 AM
>To: glenn.morton@btinternet.com; asa@calvin.edu
>Subject: RE: Herodotus' Mice and the need for historical verification
>
>
>On 20th May, Glenn wrote: "Burgy, ... You clearly do say that the
>Bible isn't falsifiable and in one sense challenge me to disprove you. I
>like that. For you that works."
>
>I think what I said -- or at least MEANT, was that I could not
>think of any
>way in which anything in scripture was falsifiable. I may well be wrong
>though.
>

If it isn't falsifiable, then do we merely believe it because we beleive it
to be true? Is faith really based on that type of thin ice?
>
glenn

see http://www.glenn.morton.btinternet.co.uk/dmd.htm
for lots of creation/evolution information
anthropology/geology/paleontology/theology\
personal stories of struggle

• Next message: Glenn Morton: "RE: Ignorant antievolutionists"
• Previous message: Jan de Koning: "Re: I'm tired of posts with no specifics (was "Conservative")"
• Maybe in reply to: Glenn Morton: "Herodotus' Mice and the need for historical verification"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 31 2002 - 12:42:15 EDT