Re: Proof?

From: Kamilla Ludwig (anamchara7@juno.com)
Date: Thu May 16 2002 - 19:52:27 EDT

  • Next message: RDehaan237@aol.com: "Re: The Mother of Concordisms"

    Shuan,

    Pardon me if I don't accept someone who engages in revisionist exegesis
    as an arbiter of what is an objective source! I've given you the
    references, both Schmidt and Satinover have additional ample notes to
    original sources. Why didn't you go to them instead of engaging in
    fruitless internet searches?

    Kamilla

    P.S. Thanks for that Scripture reference. It's one of the reasons I
    engage in these fruitless discussions with (dare I say it?) closedminded
    folks like you.

    >Moreover, I
    > Googled
    > some sites, but found nothing specifically about gays from objective
    > sources
    > except
    > http://www.inform.umd.edu/Diamondback/00-06-22/news5.html

    > Shuan wrote:
    > More pointless hand waving. you have only celebrated your
    > closemindedness.Here's a Scripture for you. I John 4:7-8
    >
    >
    > Kamilla
    >
    > ________________________________________________________________
    > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
    > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
    > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
    > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
    >
    >

    ________________________________________________________________
    GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
    Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
    Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
    http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 16 2002 - 23:57:11 EDT