Archaeology and Mormonism (incidental to liberal theology)

From: bivalve (bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com)
Date: Wed May 15 2002 - 13:34:37 EDT

  • Next message: Tim Ikeda: "Re: What is "natural" anyway?"

    Actually, I believe some of the oldest New World archaeological sites
    do have horse remains. However, these are not domestic horses, and
    the native horses, along with many other large animals, were wiped
    out long before the time period claimed for the Book of Mormon.
    Several other types of Old World animals were also claimed to have
    been found in the New World in the Book of Mormon. Thus, the book of
    Mormon is biogeographically inaccurate, whereas the taxa mentioned in
    the Bible actually occurred in ancient Palestine (though many are now
    gone).

         Dr. David Campbell
         Old Seashells
         University of Alabama
         Biodiversity & Systematics
         Dept. Biological Sciences
         Box 870345
         Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
         bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com

    That is Uncle Joe, taken in the masonic regalia of a Grand Exalted
    Periwinkle of the Mystic Order of Whelks-P.G. Wodehouse, Romance at
    Droitgate Spa



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 15 2002 - 13:47:26 EDT