Re: What is "natural" anyway?

From: Kamilla Ludwig (anamchara7@juno.com)
Date: Wed May 15 2002 - 02:35:36 EDT

  • Next message: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "A 2350 BC Middle Eastern cosmic blast?"

    Nice try, Tim. But pregnancy isn't inherently risky - it may well be for
    some but clearly is not so for all. It also confers certain
    protections, especially if a woman has her first child before the age of
    30. Sodomy, on the other hand, is inherently damaging to the lower bowel
    (whether or not a condom is used, by the way).

    Kamilla

    On Tue, 14 May 2002 20:40:41 -0400 Tim Ikeda <tikeda@sprintmail.com>
    writes:
    >
    > Kamilla wrote to Shaun:
    > (in the "Re: Is there a gay gene?" thread)
    > [...]
    > > Since your brother is a psychiatrist, he surely knows the
    > consequences
    > > to his physical health of acting on his homosexual desires.
    >
    > I suppose levels of stress-related hormones in his body may drop
    > and he may live longer and happier. Long-term depression can really
    > take a toll on the body.
    >
    > > Is that something you really want to embrace on his behalf?
    > [...]
    >
    > Well, heterosexual sex may lead to the often risky medical
    > condition
    > known as pregnancy.

    ________________________________________________________________
    GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
    Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
    Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
    http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 15 2002 - 13:37:12 EDT