Re: Genesis & sacramental texts

From: bivalve (bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com)
Date: Tue May 07 2002 - 19:25:26 EDT

  • Next message: bivalve: "Re: 2900 BC vs. 2350 BC and Bible chronology"

    The Westminster Confession of Faith appeals to the "light of nature"
    (as well as many arguments from Scripture) to support the contention
    that transubstantiation is incorrect. This use of physical evidence
    to support a less literalistic interpretation seems like a good
    parallel for the appeal to physical evidence in interpreting Genesis
    1. My only attempt so far at applying this reasoning had an already
    unreceptive audience, so I cannot tell if it is likely to sway others.

         Dr. David Campbell
         Old Seashells
         University of Alabama
         Biodiversity & Systematics
         Dept. Biological Sciences
         Box 870345
         Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
         bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com

    That is Uncle Joe, taken in the masonic regalia of a Grand Exalted
    Periwinkle of the Mystic Order of Whelks-P.G. Wodehouse, Romance at
    Droitgate Spa



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 08 2002 - 00:04:42 EDT