See how difficult it is. I subscribe to biblical infallibility, but not
to what some people make of it. Of course, I know as well that
translations depend on the knowledge, or lack of knowledge of the
translators, meaning thaat I am suspicious when certain words are
used. Also, it is necessary to take into account the different copies of
the originals.
However, absolutely necessary to be accepted as a Christian is to accept
Christ as your SAviour, and not just a good example.
Jan
At 07:59 PM 06/05/02 -0700, Dr. Blake Nelson wrote:
>I thought his point was that he accepted _even_ those
>who did subscribe to Biblical infallability, but did
>not believe it himself. I thought the broader
>principle he espoused was everyone who depend on
>Christ for their salvation. Maybe I missed something.
>
>--- Walter Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > > What about me, Jan.
> >
> > I do not suscribe to Biblical infallabilty.
> > > Am I rejected?
> > > Walt
> > >
> > JW Burgeson wrote:
> > >
> > > Jan wrote: "I probably have said this before. I
> > accept all people who
> > > believe the infallibility of the Bible as
> > Christian brothers and sisters,
> > > who depend for their salvation on Christ's
> > death."
> > >
> > > Do you accept me too? I could not subscribe to
> > the above (narrow)
> > > definition.
> > >
> > > How wide do you draw the circle? I draw it very
> > wide indeed, for I'd rather
> > > err in that direction than the other.
> > >
> > > Burgy
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
>http://health.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 11:33:40 EDT