Re: Gen 1 and Concordism

From: Howard J. Van Till (hvantill@novagate.com)
Date: Tue Feb 26 2002 - 17:45:25 EST

Next message: bivalve: "Re: Virgin Birth"

Previous message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Defending Pelagius against the Pelagians"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Ruest: "Gen 1 and Concordism"
Next in thread: PHSEELY@aol.com: "Re: Gen 1 and Concordism"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>From: Peter Ruest <pruest@pop.mysunrise.ch>

> Perhaps we should reconsider what divine inspiration really
> means.

That would be an interesting thing to do. Vastly differing theories
regarding the character and appropriate use of the biblical text lurk
beneath the surface of many of the disagreements on this list.

Howard Van Till

Next message: bivalve: "Re: Virgin Birth"
Previous message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Defending Pelagius against the Pelagians"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Ruest: "Gen 1 and Concordism"
Next in thread: PHSEELY@aol.com: "Re: Gen 1 and Concordism"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 26 2002 - 17:59:25 EST