Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)

From: D. F. Siemens, Jr. (dfsiemensjr@juno.com)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 18:28:28 EST

  • Next message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)"

    Michael,
    You and Howard phrase things as you do because you are more genteel. The
    correct understanding is that God is smart enough to agree with me.
    Dave

    On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 21:41:20 -0000 "Michael Roberts"
    <topper@robertschirk.u-net.com> writes:
    > I prefer " How to play intellectual ping-pong" In every argument it
    > is
    > either PING or PONG and never PING-PONG.
    >
    > This is not my original but comes from an essay by Basil Mitchell
    > "How to
    > play theoloigcal ping-pong" so we always take the two extremes and
    > say
    > choose one
    >
    > Creation/Evolution
    > Jesus of History / Risen Lord
    >
    > Lots more examples from every sphere of society.
    >
    > Michael
    >
    >
    > > Perhaps one character trait of any form of fundamentalism
    > (religious,
    > > political, racial, etc.) is its binary logic: You're either "us"
    > or
    > "them."
    > > Given that approach, the tribal "God" is presumed to be of the
    > same
    > "mind."
    > >
    > > Howard Van Till
    > >
    > >
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 18:32:31 EST