Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)

• Previous message: Jim Eisele: "Good-bye"
• Maybe in reply to: Jim Eisele: "Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)"
• Next in thread: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jim wrote: "Eventually God will ask us if we 100% believe or 0%."

I really doubt that. I see Christianity as the establishing of an agape
love relationship. Whether one "believes 100%" in some statement of
history does not really seem important to that.

Soul: Well, God, here I am.
God: First question. Did you believe 100% in the virgin birth?
Soul: Well, I didn't disbelieve, but I have to admit I had some doubts.
God: (pulls the lever).

See Taylor's "The Myth of Certainty." It should be required reading for
any Christian who thinks he thinks he thinks. (3 part duplication
intentional).

John Burgeson (Burgy)

http://www.burgy.50megs.com
       (science/theology, quantum mechanics, baseball, ethics,
        humor, cars, God's intervention into natural causation, etc.)

• Next message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)"
• Previous message: Jim Eisele: "Good-bye"
• Maybe in reply to: Jim Eisele: "Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)"
• Next in thread: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 11:26:25 EST