Re: Why methodological naturalism?

From: Cmekve@aol.com
Date: Sat Feb 16 2002 - 01:40:37 EST

  • Next message: Michael Roberts: "Re: resurrection etc"

    In a message dated 2/15/02 6:40:17 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
    gmurphy@raex.com writes:

    <<
         "Stroboscopic deism" is an excellent phrase which deserves to come into
     general use.
     
                                                             Shalom,
                                                             George
    >>

    Yea, I like it too! It seems to capture a vital aspect of what many on this
    list (you and Howard especially) have been saying for years. As I mentioned
    in a post once before, and as Steve Smith recently wrote, the term (or a
    variation anyway) was used by Edward Oakes in an article in First Things.
    Oakes is a Jesuit philosopher at Regis University here in Denver, but
    previously taught in New York (NYU?) -- hence his connection with R.J.
    Neuhaus and F.T.

    Karl
    ***********************
    Karl V. Evans
    cmekve@aol.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 16 2002 - 01:40:51 EST